| Team Number | Number of Blades | Pitch Angle at Hub (degrees) | Blade Radius (cm) | Load Used (Ohms) | Volts Generated | Milliamps Generated | Output Power (mWatts) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Team | RPM |
| 1 | 2770 |
| 2 | 3960 |
| 3 | 3675 |
| 4 | 3235 |
| 5 | 2440 |
| 6 | 4055 |
| 7 | 1060 |
| 8 | 3055 |
All rotors were trimmed or otherwise allowed for a pitch dependent on radius -- a twist component. This was very important for achieving good scores.
Craftsmanship or general care in building the rotors was paramount.
Slight imbalances, unintended flex or other disturbances can add significant
wind resistance or energy dissipation.
General Information:
Team 2
Front
View. Nice paint job.
Side
View. Shows blade tilt -- these blades were double layers superglued
together to make a much stiffer airfoil.
Team 3
Front
View.
Side
View. Blades tilt back slightly.
Team 4
Front
View. Plastic easter egg as nose cone!
Side
View. Showing manual adjustment to blade twist near hub.
Team 5
Front
View. Easter egg nose and wide blades.
Side
View.
Team 6
Front
View. Very nicely trimmed.
Side
View. These pictures don't show much because of the black paint
Motor
Close-Up. Cooled down in dry ice to reduce resistance in winding. Assist
magnets glued to side to improve output.
Team 7
Front
View. Not much trimming.
Hub+Motor
Close-Up. This motor not used during competition.
Custom
Resistor. This variable resistor was used to optimize output power.
This wasn't used during competition because the range chosen was too large.
Team 8
Oblique
View.
Top
View. Nice trimming at tip to reduce drag.
(c) 1999, by Dunbar P. Birnie, III